Friday 17 January 2014

Semester Review.

If I’m honest I kind of feel like this has been my worse semester of the course. When I started back I was really excited, but over the course of the three months I just felt my energy being drained. I can’t really explain what it was, as I have been through tougher situations without it affecting my work so much, I could just feel myself becoming really drained and lacking motivation to do anything. 

I did end up getting really upset about this, as I had been asking to produce a documentary for a visit to the university by Reverend Jesse Jackson, which was a huge opportunity. Ultimately I think was too big a project for me to handle on my own, but I don’t the commissioners understood how big a project it was either. I became overwhelmed by the scale of it, but I didn’t feel at the time that I had anyone I could go to to say “help me”. Not that there aren’t people, looking back now I can think of a lot of people I should have gone to, but at the time it just didn’t occur to me and I did buckle a bit. For me this all really culminated on the day after being told in the morning (by a member of staff) that I had done a terrible job and ending being left to look after the bags whilst the event was happening. I really felt like I had failed, and after this I just wanted the semester to be over and to take a break from it all. 

I was going through a lot of stuff personally, that I wasn’t handling well at the time, but have since sorted out and I feel a lot better. What it did make me realise is what a close group of friends I have, and those are the people that I enjoy working with. 

I am proud of the work we did together this semester, and I think we’ve all developed a really good working relationship which helps us to get stuff done quicker and more efficiently as we all know each other’s strengths and weaknesses.


I look forward to working on my final projects and making something that shows what I’ve learnt over the past three years, and hopefully I can use in the future to get some work.

Networking.

We had Akil Ahmed (apologies if the spelling is wrong) come in this week to have small one on one conversations about what we are hoping to do once we leave university, and advise on the best possible course of action to achieve this. 

My view at the moment is that if I’m lucky enough to get any opportunities then I’m not going to be too fussy about them, especially at the beginning. I spent a lot of my school life being unhappy and unsure about what industry I want to work in, now that I’ve found one that I’m going to be happy in I’m happy to take anything as long as I’m helping make TV shows.

I do love Dramas and Comedies, and these are two genres that British Television has a history of doing very well, so I said that is ultimately where I’d like to end up. But at the same time, I’d love to try lots of new things, as I’ve only tried a few different things on my course. I’ve said already that I’d love the experience of making a documentary again, as I only did that in my first year and it didn’t go very well.

My main problem was that I wasn’t sure about how to go about getting in contact with people about getting work experience. I’ve tried applying for advertised work experience placements before but haven’t had any luck, as it’s so competitive. The advice I got was to think about what shows I’d like to be involved with and try to get in contact with someone from the show and basically ask them if there was any chance of getting on set. 

I didn’t realise it could be as simple as this, I had thought of it before but I didn’t want to seem like some annoying student. But if this is what I’ve got to do, then this is what I’ve got to do. I’ve had a think about what I’d like to do and I plan on getting in contact very soon and hopefully something will come out of it. 


At the same time, it kind of made me realise that I should be a bit more focused on what I want and where in the industry I want to end up. It’s all well and good saying that I’ll be happy to be working in the industry, but if I’ve got something to aim for then it will keep me more focused and more driven, and I could end up doing something I never thought I’d end up doing.

Response to Pitch.

If I’m being honest the feedback for this pitch wasn’t very good. It’s not that I think our idea is bad at all, I just think that were weren’t very good a putting it across to the tutors. 

There are lots of areas of the documentary that we haven’t got solid plans for at the moment, because a lot of depends on what kind of situation our presenter will get themselves into. We have talked a lot about where we think the story could end up going but the truth is that until we start production, we don’t really know where that is going to be. I don’t think we were clear in letting the tutors know that we are prepared for whatever happens and we understand the difficulties that we are going to face. Having said that, I do think it was completely fair for the tutors to bring it up as a point as it is something that we do have to be aware of.

The liked that we already had plans for a presenter, with our host pretty much guaranteed before the pitch. I think Hannah has done a great job finding the presenter, managing to find a you woman, with a background in technology journalism, which fits our documentary perfectly. Weirdly enough, if we hadn’t already had the presenter sorted out, then we wouldn’t have as many plans laid out as we did, so it was lucky that we had that sorted.


Overall, I guess they must have had some faith in us because the project was green lit without a second pitch. Even though we had trouble sometimes with putting across what we meant, I think they could see that we were all passionate enough about the project for it to work, as we were backing each other up when things didn’t look like they were going so well. I have faith in the group that we’ll manage to pull it all together and make a fantastic new documentary.

Response to Pitch.

If I’m being honest the feedback for this pitch wasn’t very good. It’s not that I think our idea is bad at all, I just think that were weren’t very good a putting it across to the tutors. 

There are lots of areas of the documentary that we haven’t got solid plans for at the moment, because a lot of depends on what kind of situation our presenter will get themselves into. We have talked a lot about where we think the story could end up going but the truth is that until we start production, we don’t really know where that is going to be. I don’t think we were clear in letting the tutors know that we are prepared for whatever happens and we understand the difficulties that we are going to face. Having said that, I do think it was completely fair for the tutors to bring it up as a point as it is something that we do have to be aware of.

The liked that we already had plans for a presenter, with our host pretty much guaranteed before the pitch. I think Hannah has done a great job finding the presenter, managing to find a you woman, with a background in technology journalism, which fits our documentary perfectly. Weirdly enough, if we hadn’t already had the presenter sorted out, then we wouldn’t have as many plans laid out as we did, so it was lucky that we had that sorted.


Overall, I guess they must have had some faith in us because the project was green lit without a second pitch. Even though we had trouble sometimes with putting across what we meant, I think they could see that we were all passionate enough about the project for it to work, as we were backing each other up when things didn’t look like they were going so well. I have faith in the group that we’ll manage to pull it all together and make a fantastic new documentary.

Development and Research for Final Project.

For the final projects development I was approached quite early on to get involved with another project. As they had sought me out I didn’t want to say no, so I got involved as the production manager. The project itself was a studio based quiz show, which isn’t something I set out to do at the beginning of the year. If I’m being honest, I didn’t really want to go back into the studio because we had already done a lot of work in there over the past two years. Our biggest project in the second year saw us making a four part series of 20 minute episodes based in the studio and treated as if they were live. In my opinion, making a 10 minute show in the studio just didn’t seem like a bigger challenge so it wasn’t something I was initially interested in. On top of that I had directed one of the final projects the third years had been working on when I was in the second year. But it was a format I hadn’t worked on before so I thought I would give it a go. I’ve been asked to be Production Manager for the project, so I’ve been reading Production Management by Linda Stradling, which I bought after she delivered a really good guest lecture.

I haven’t really been involved with the development of that project but the concept intrigues me and I’m excited about trying a new role, and learning more about that side of production, as the book has already taught me a lot.

I have been involved with the development of another project, based off an idea my friend Hannah had. She suggested creating a documentary about dating in the modern day. My main concern was that this has been done before, but she was quick to point out that we would be focusing mainly on a new form of online dating. There are several apps that have launched on smart phones that really give a different experience to the online dating world. The project itself is titled Love in Your Pocket. 


What we’ll be doing with the project is finding a presenter and asking Him/Her to take part in one of these new apps and documenting the experience. For inspiration I have been looking at the documentaries by Louis Theroux and Cherry Healey. What these two presenters too is really get engrossed in the world they are documenting and ask the type of questions that average viewer would probably want to ask. In terms of visual style it will be mostly about making sure I’ve got enough cameras to capture the action. This is something I noticed immediately when doing research, as any documentary we have worked on before has only used one camera. The plan with this documentary is to set up dates with other people using the app, so I’ll only have one opportunity to capture the event but as I have a lot of experience working with live projects, I feel like I’ll be able to achieve this.

Response to Feedback.

Overall, I’d say that the feedback we received for this project was fair. There were positive points picked out, but there were also some areas that we were given constructive criticism for. What I thought was good about the feedback, was that it was mostly issues we had already identified ourselves, so it shows that we’ve gotten to a point where we can be objective about our own work.

One point that was raised was that some of the shot choices seemed a bit odd. There’s a shot in the film where two of the characters are having a conversation in the corridor and we’d decided that we were going to shoot it handheld. Now I’ve already spoken about some of the troubles we had on the actual production day for this shoot, so that isn’t something that I’m going to talk about again, but it definitely had an adverse effect on this scene as we just didn’t have enough time to get it done right. The criticism was that the shot was just a bit too shaky, which when I look at it now I can see and I appreciate the opinion. What was interesting here though was that one of the tutors completely disagreed and liked the way that that scene had been shot. It was interesting to see differing opinions between two people, both of whom’s opinion you respect, not agreeing on whether something was good or not. I did appreciate the feedback, but I think it showed me more than anything that you aren’t going to please everyone, and as long as you’ve got a reason for something being shot a certain you shouldn’t really have anything to worry about. Just make sure that you’ve really thought through what you’re doing.

We also received feedback about the script, and the structure of the story. The pointed out that there were some bits that didn’t quite make sense on the screen. One of the main points for this was the use of the original dialogue from Shakespeare’s script. We used in two different ways, for when the politicians were debating, as we wanted to convey this idea that everything politicians say is sort of made to sound really clever. And we also used it as an internal monologue for Romeo’s character when he’s falling in love with Julian. It was pointed out to us that using it in two different ways as well as mixing in contemporary language could become confusing to the viewer. At the time it wasn’t something that I’d really spotted, but as soon as it was pointed out to me it became very clear what they were talking about. I think in the future we just need to make sure that just because something is clear to us, doesn’t mean it’s going to be clear to the audience watching it. We knew what we were trying to do, but to someone who has no idea what they’re about to see I understand how it could be confusing.


I think the main point I took away from this was to plan, and then look back at what you’ve planned and make sure it makes sense. It’s quite easy to get carried away with an idea that you like without stopping to think about what anyone else will think, but it’s really important to do that.

The Set Brief Experience.

For this project we were given the choice of working on Drama or a Documentary. I said before that these were the two areas that I was interested in working in again, and now I had to make the choice as to which one. Our group all really wanted to make a documentary, but as we only had a couple of weeks before we had to deliver the final product we decided to make a drama.

The reason behind this choice is that when you’re making a piece of fictional work, then you are in control of what happens. Not that’s it that easy, but all you need is a story and some actors and you can get it done relatively simply. The main thing that concerned us what that if we made a documentary, then it all hinges on the contributor being willing to participate, and if they change their mind at the last minute then the entire project can fall apart. On top of that, none of us really had any connections to anything that we thought would make an interesting enough subject so we opted to make a drama. 

We were given a choice of three famous scenes to base our script on; a scene from Romeo and Juliet, Pulp Fiction or Sleeper. We decided to go with Romeo and Juliet as the scene we were given was where their eyes meet across the dance floor, and they fall in love. As there is no dialogue in this scene we thought that it was left quite open for us to interpret it in different ways. We decided to do a modern take, but not in the same vein as Baz Lurhmann’s Romoe + Juliet.

We decided our roles for the project, and as we’ve all worked together before we know each other’s strengths and we all have certain roles that we like to do. There was no arguing about it, really we all knew what we would end up doing; I was the director. My main concern was that we managed to recreate the idea that the two main characters have a big reason for the fact that they can’t be together, and the idea of two families not liking each other just doesn’t seem like something that could still really happen. The idea we came up with would be that the two main characters would be from rival political parties. On top of that we also decided to make the focus of the story a homosexual relationship, rather than a heterosexual relationship, as in the original. This worked really well with our idea of putting a political spin on the film as we decided we could incorporate the real life debate of same sex marriage law, and have that be what is making the love between the two leads forbidden.

As a director it was a fun new challenge, as based on the script written by Hannah, we had quite a good little story to tell in a short amount of time. Rather than just adapting the one scene, it was written as a very short story, nearly all taking place in the same room but still incorporating other locations. 

Time was a big factor with this production. I mentioned before that we were worried that making a documentary would just mean that our time was way too tight to get anything done properly, well that ended up being a problem with this production. As we needed quite specific locations for our film, we only had access to one of the rooms for a total of three hours. This was going to be the only time that we would be able to use the room as a shooting location before the film had to be delivered, so it was imperative that we got as we much done as possible and used our time wisely. This is where I first real problem lay, as shortly after we arrived at the location we heard from one of our actors that he was running late. 

Not wanting to waste any time I got everything in place and shot everything I could do with just the one actor there. But after that it was just a waiting game, and he was over an hour late. Not only was he late but he hadn’t learnt his lines. Normally when I’ve worked with actors before they’ve either learnt their lines, or we’ve agreed before that will be a bit more of an improvisation element to it. But with this film we were quoting Shakespeare, and it was very important to all us that we kept some of the original dialogue so we had a strong connection to our inspiration. Having one of the actors not know his lines was incredibly frustrating, especially as we were already falling behind, but I knew I couldn’t let it affect the production so I just took a deep breath and threw myself into to get everything done as quickly as possible.

This did lead to a good new learning experience for me, as I ended up having to work very closely with the actors. Before this I had just blocked the actors, and as they already knew their lines, there was maybe just the occasional note I’d have to give about the performance. But with this I really had to help him get his mouth around the words, which involved breaking it down into small chunks that he’d be able to memorise and then putting it all together in the edit.

It also meant that we had to change what we had planned to do in quite a significant way, just because time wouldn’t have allowed us to get everything done if we had shot it in the way we had originally planned. When the film gets into Romeo’s monologue, it was originally something we were going to have him deliver into the camera, but as this we had to keep breaking up the dialogue for our actor, this wouldn’t have worked so we had to change it into a voiceover.


It all worked out in the end, and for such a short film made on a tight schedule, it really taught me a lot. It’s definitely something I’m taking forward from this point, in that you can never be too prepared and it’s always a good idea to have a back up plan in place. 

Final Project Ideas, Influences and Approaches.

Choosing what to work on for my Final Project is a tough decision. I think it’s the fact that the word ‘Final’ is such a huge part of. It feels like this is what I’ve been working towards, but at the same time I’m just at the beginning, I’ll be learning about the production of television shows for years to come yet. 

There are two different things I’d really like to work on, and have a creative handle on. I’d either like to work on a documentary, as I’ve only done one in my first year, and it didn’t go very well. And the other thing I’d like to work on is a short film combining comedy with drama.

Documentary, as a genre, wasn’t something that massively interested me before starting the course. I had seen documentaries but they were only really the ones you see on Channel 4, and I only really watched them because everyone else was talking about them and I wanted to be part of the conversation. But the teaching on this course really opened my eyes, and I’ve been watching a lot more documentaries, and if not documentaries then a lot more factual programming at least. 

I’m a big fan of Louie Theroux and his documentary style, but he tends to hit some quite hard to deal with subjects. Cherry Healey is someone else who has adopted a similar style but keeps hers a bit more light and gets a bit more personally involved on an emotional level. This is something I’m interested in trying, as I think it’s becoming a more and more popular way of getting viewers to become more involved with the programme as they have a face that they can be familiar with and it helps them become more engrossed, as they feel like they are going on a journey with the presenter.

As I said above, I’d like to work on a short film combining comedy and drama. I’ve been trying to write some scripts combining the two genres, but I haven’t got anything at the moment that I’d feel confident enough to work on. But the combination of the two genres is something that I really enjoy as a viewer, so it is definitely something I’m going to keep working on and possibly consider when it comes to the final projects.


But more importantly I want to be part of team that I work well with. I’ve worked on quite a few projects over the past couple of years, and the one most important thing I’ve learned is that you have to like, or at least have a good working relationship, with the rest of your team members. There has to be a level of respect and understanding for everything to work, otherwise it tends to just leave a small amount of people doing the majority of work for the team.